Solutions / Infrastructure and asset review
Source imagery, elevation or suitable ground-motion products for your portfolio. Bring them together with asset records to review changes and build a practical inspection tool.
Explore a workflow for this industry. The app preview uses illustrative data; contact us to discuss your own sites, requirements and access.
The work you need to do
Specify a corridor, site portfolio or structure and the detail your review requires. Order suitable data for your established engineering workflow.
Asset-area imagery, terrain or motion products
Compare supported surface changes or published displacement patterns with your asset inventory. Keep the observation history and measurement quality close to each finding.
Asset-linked review candidates
Bring earlier reviews, ground measurements and field notes into one app so colleagues can see the reason for each follow-up.
Inspection queue and asset history
01 / Acquire the data
Request data for infrastructure anywhere on Earth, with the coverage and measurement requirements stated explicitly. Compare suitable archive imagery, elevation surveys or existing motion products; assess additional collection where needed. Confirm source availability and suitability before ordering. Use the delivery in your existing process or continue in Milkypad.
Just need the data? Acquiring it is a complete outcome. Use delivered files in your own tools where the license permits, or continue with analysis and apps in Milkypad.
02 / Run your own analysis
Use specialist observations in a workflow organized around your asset identifiers and inspection decisions.
Define the corridor or portfolio, identify the review question and add relevant inspection history or ground measurements.
Compare source coverage, dates and measurement definitions. Review the quote and rights, then receive the data and quality information.
Ask for asset-linked comparisons and charts. Review reference assumptions and local context with the appropriate technical reviewer.
Save an inspection shortlist or create a team app linking each asset to observations, review notes and subsequent field checks.
03 / Build and customize your app
A proposed app for reviewing observations alongside asset and inspection history. Ask for portfolio filters and specialist charts in ordinary language; colleagues then use the configured views directly.
Explore a prepared example
01 / Data inputs
Define the corridor and assets under review. Request appropriate imagery, surveys or motion products with their measurement definitions.
02 / Review a layer
The highlighted corridor segment is a schematic review candidate. Reliable interpretation depends on measurement quality and engineering context.
03 / Use an app
An app can place observation history, technical review notes and inspection records beside each asset, ready for the next assessment.
Prepared scenes and records show how a workflow could look. These are illustrative locations and layers, with no live data or analysis.
Build an asset review app for this corridor. Link available motion charts and optical observations to asset IDs, show measurement quality, and let reviewers record investigation priorities and field findings.
Describe the tool and the changes you need in ordinary language. The AI assistant helps build it; colleagues use the resulting maps, tables, and controls without writing code.
Explore App BuilderCandidate changes, asset identifiers and locations with insufficient measurements.
Dated charts and source context for a selected asset.
Review priorities and supporting records for the receiving team.
Use the result with context
A radar line-of-sight measurement records movement toward or away from the satellite, rather than full three-dimensional movement. Areas without reliable measurements cannot be assumed stable. Screening results require engineering interpretation and do not certify structural safety or predict failure.
Questions for your workflow
An appropriate existing motion product may answer the question. The intended workflow helps assess that option before choosing more involved processing or a different source.
Yes. Ground measurements can support interpretation when their locations, time periods and reference systems are compatible. Keep those references explicit in the comparison.
Yes. Request the products and formats your technical team needs. Analysis and app creation are optional ways to organize subsequent review and repeat work.
Milkypad for infrastructure
Share your coverage, measurement requirements, review interval and existing asset or survey records.
Discuss your requirements